¶2The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul*582this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.
¶3Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion;
¶4Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.