Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 A.D. 583

Haynes v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1951-10-30

Decided 1951-10-30

¶1The defendant, however, was not entitled to any credit for alimony payments in a larger amount made by him prior to the entry of the order of modification; for that reason we reverse the second order and grant plaintiff’s motion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

/279/ad/583 · .json · Public domain