¶1Defendant’s remarriage, with its attendant additional obligations, is not such a change in circumstances as to justify a reduction of the amount of alimony. (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 App. Div. 946; Withowski v. Withowski, 271 App. Div. 901, affd. 297 N. Y. 626.) Appeal from order dated September 18, 1950, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
279 A.D. 670
Raynor v. Raynor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1951
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1951-11-19
Relies on Witkowski v. Witkowski
Decided 1951-11-19