Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 A.D.2d 559

Palamara v. Palamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2001-01-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molía, J.), dated July 6, 1999, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for an award of maintenance and an attorney’s fee pendente lite.

¶2Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee pendente lite is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,

¶3Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

¶4Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

¶5The Supreme Court’s award of maintenance pendente lite was a reasonable accommodation between the plaintiffs means and the defendant’s needs, considering the parties’ preseparation standard of living (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the parties’ conflicting allegations should be resolved at trial, when they can be fully explored (see, Wolfson v Wolfson, 272 AD2d 470). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

/279/ad2d/559 · .json · Public domain