Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 ALA 267 - Cooper v. Acuff

Cooper v. Acuff’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mi-Lady Cleaners v. McDaniel · Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co. · Mayfield v. Court of County Com. Tuscaloosa County · Gainer v. Board of Education of Jefferson County · Ex Parte Loyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appeals may be taken to the supreme court from the judgment of the judges of the circuit courts, on application for writs of certiorari, supersedeas, quo warranto, mandamus, and other remedial writs, upon plaintiff or defendant giving security for the costs of appeal, approved by the judge trying the same, within thirty days from the day of the judgment; but such appeal shall not operate as a supersedeas of the judgment, unless bond with sufficient sureties be given by the appellant, payable to the appellee, in such sum as the judge hearing the application shall require, . conditioned to pay all damages thereby sustained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.