Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 ALA 414 - Foshee v. Mims

Foshee v. Mims’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Limbaugh v. Comer · Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hinson · Hoomes v. State · Tanner v. Dobbins · Stokes v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A decree establishing the location of a boundary line between the lands of coterminous owners must be reasonably certain within itself or by reference to the pleadings, evidence or documents filed in the cause, and the decree must be so certain that the line may be located and marked by an officer of the court who may be appointed to so mark the line without reference to extrinsic evidence or the use of his own discretion or by drawing his own conclusions as to any fact determinant of the true location of the line.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.