Hohl v. Bastian’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1412 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Celotex Corporation v. Edwards · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Matter of Wood v. P Wood & Pa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if [they] acted in good faith and in a manner [they] reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re WR Grace & Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.