In Re Enron Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco · Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc. · Trustees of Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc. · Jartran Inc Reuben Donnelley Corporation · Mid Region Petroleum Inc General American Transportation Corporation v. W Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Considering inducement by the debtor-in-possession to be a crucial element comports with the policy reason for allowing the priority, which is to encourage third-parties to supply the debtor-in-possession with goods and services with the goal of achieving a reorganization to benefit all creditors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.