Stetson v. Stindt’s Empirical Analysis
279 F. 209 · 1922
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1998 · most notably Dimick v. Schiedt (1935), Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. (1933)
26 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holcombe Bowden v. Reynolds · Glenwood Irr. Co. v. Vallery · Roberts v. Rigden · Fischer v. Holmes · Benedict v. Michigan Beef & Provision Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] verdict * * * which is perverse and directly violative of the charge of the court and is wholly without evidence to support it, cannot stand. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.