Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 F. 794

Docket No. 23777.

In re Simon

Massachusetts District Court

Decided April 12, 1922.)

Massachusetts District Court · decided 1922-04-12

<p>Eiankruptcy @=>473 — Costs may be awarded against bankrupt, when creditor’s objections to discharge sustained.</p> <p>Where a single creditor successfully prosecutes objections to the bankrupt’s discharge, the court has power to award costs, consisting of such actual and necessary disbursements as would be taxable in equity, against the bankrupt.</p> <p>g=»For other eases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bragassa v. St. Louis Cycle · In re Simon · In re Ratliff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Petitions allowed in part, and denied in part · Decided 1922-04-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1983

2 federal appellate ·

201922193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Eiankruptcy @=>473 — Costs may be awarded against bankrupt, when creditor’s objections to discharge sustained.

¶2Where a single creditor successfully prosecutes objections to the bankrupt’s discharge, the court has power to award costs, consisting of such actual and necessary disbursements as would be taxable in equity, against the bankrupt.

¶3g=»For other eases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

¶4In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Isaac Simon, bankrupt. On petitions for allowance of disbursements and counsel fees.

¶5Petitions allowed in part, and denied in part.

¶6See, also, 268 Fed. 1006.

¶7William Hirsh, of Boston, Mass., for petitioners.

¶8William H. Garland, of Boston, Mass., for bankrupt.

¶9MORTON, District Judge.

¶10These are petitions for the allowance of disbursements and for counsel fees to a creditor who alone prosecuted successfully objections to the discharge of the bankrupt. It is objected that there is no power to make such orders, and, if there be such power, it ought not to be exercised.

¶11Simon was a fraudulent bankrupt, who, although not entitled to his discharge, prosecuted his petition for it. No question concerning Ihe estate is involved. As between the bankrupt and the creditor, I see no reason why the usual rule should not be applied, and the costs of the proceeding taxed against the losing party, and,'I think that the court has power to award them. In Bragassa v. St. Louis Cycle Co. (C. C. A. 5th Cir.) 107 Fed. 77, 46 C. C. A. 154, it was held that the taxation of costs against a bankrupt whose petition for discharge was denied was correct. “As the costs were legitimately incurred, we see no other way than to tax the same to the losing party.” Pardee, J., 107 Fed. 80, 46 C. C. A. 157. See, also, to the same effect, In re Wolnert, 1 A. L. R. 436. The same result was reached under the act of L867 (14 Stat. 517). In re Holgate, Fed. Cas. No. 6,601.

¶12The petitioner is allowed as costs such actual and necessary disbursements in the proceeding as would be taxable in equity. The pe:ition for counsel fees is denied.

/279/f1d/794 · .json · Public domain