Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 F.2d 34 - Vasquez v. United States

Vasquez v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

279 F.2d 34 · 1960

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Kadwell v. United States (1963), Everett v. United States (1964)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

180196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Von Moltke v. Gillies · Kercheval v. United States · Wales ex rel. Wales Trucking Co. v. United States · Edwards v. United States · Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he trial court has a wide discretion in passing on such a motion and the reviewing court will not disturb the trial court’s ruling in the absence of an abuse of that discretion * * * particularly when, as here, the defendant did not allege his innocence of the offense charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.