279 F.2d 685 - Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill — 279 F.2d 685

How this case has been cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland; Charles J. McNamee, Judge.

¶1

Harold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants.

¶2

Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell & McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.

¶3

Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

¶4

William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, Ill., E. S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings & Wyman, Chicago, Ill., on the brief.

¶5

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

¶6

PER CURIAM.

¶7

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49.