United States v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis
279 F.2d 754 · 1960
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2004
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Fairbanks Steam Shovel Company v. Wills, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Federal Contracting Company · Edelstein v. United States · United States v. Freed · Cajiafas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In making this contention Kramer attempts a collateral attack on the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court over the subject matter of the suit. The decisions hold unequivocally that such an attack may not be countenanced in any case against the bankrupt, even in a criminal proceeding, where the indictment has charged the bankrupt with a violation of the Bankruptcy Act. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Wills, 1916, 240 U.S. 642 , 649, 36 S.Ct. 466 , 60 L.Ed. 841 ; Cajiafas v. United States, 6 Cir., 1930, 38 F.2d 3 ; Edelstein v. United States, 8 Cir., 1906, 149 F. 636 , 9 L.R.A., N.S., 236 ; and United States v. Freed, C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1910, 179 F. 236 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.