Baltz v. The Fair’s Empirical Analysis
279 F.2d 899 · 1960
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2019
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kiwi Coders Corporation and James G. McKay v. Acro Tool & Die Works and Alfred J. Farkas, 1 · Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obearnester Glass Co. · American Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Josam Mfg. Co. · National Rejectors, Inc. v. A. B. T. Mfg. Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As a general rule, however, we deem it better practice not to resort to contempt proceedings for the determination of collateral substantial questions arising subsequent to the issuance of an injunction, unless it is quite clear from the surrounding circumstances that such a course is required to preserve the integrity of the injunction.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“well established that it is within the discretion of the trial court to determine whether the charge of infringement is to be determined in a contempt proceeding or in a separate action * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.