Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 F.3d 1327 - Bui v. Haley

Bui v. Haley’s Empirical Analysis

279 F.3d 1327 · 2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Sumner v. Mata · Purkett v. Elem · Kuntz v. City of Dayton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Batson, 476 U.S. at 98, 106 S.Ct. at 1723-24 (internal quotations and citation omitted). Furthermore, this court has held that vague explanations will be insufficient to refute a prima facie case of racial discrimination. See United States v. Horsley, 864 F.2d 1543 , 1546 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Just as the prosecutor's explanation in Horsley that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Bui v. Haley
  2. “a single juror is not necessarily discriminated against merely because a reason for striking that juror has not been articulated, if there are sufficient other factors from which to draw the conclusion that there was no intentional discrimination against that juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Bui v. Haley
  3. “another problem I have, and I know Evans is busy and Brooks is presenting this matter, but Evans actually struck the jury .... Evans is not here and I can't listen to his comments and reasons.... [t]hat's another little problem I have.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Bui v. Haley

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.