Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unin Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos Y Alcantarillados De Puerto Rico Y’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
34 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C. (2009), 844 So. 2d 1189 - Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc. (2002)
34 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Catlin v. United States · Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division · United States v. Seeger · Negron v. United States · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of proof on an issue, he cannot prevail unless the evidence that he provides on that issue is conclusive.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“religion” to include “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j). While the language of Title VII appears to apply only to employers,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.