Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 F.3d 640 - Wfm Inc v. Cherry County

Wfm Inc v. Cherry County’s Empirical Analysis

279 F.3d 640 · 2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business Regulation · Simmons v. O'Brien · Peterson v. Nebraska Natural Gas Co. · Westcott v. Crinklaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[O]nce a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision may preclude re-litigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.