Brown v. Roe’s Empirical Analysis
279 F.3d 742 · 2002
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 234 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Hodges (2009), Jones v. Blanas (2004)
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Fay v. Noia · Bounds v. Smith · McCleskey v. Zant · Price v. Johnston · Darr v. Burford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that in making a decision on whether to consider newly offered evidence, the district court must actually exercise its discretion, rather than summarily accepting or denying the motion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Pro se habeas petitioners are to be afforded 'the benefit of any doubt’ ”) (quoting Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026 , 1027 n. 1 (9th Cir.1985)); Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dept., 901 F.2d 696 , 699 (9th Cir.1988) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nardi v. Stewart“unlike the litigant in Hoivell, who was represented by counsel, Brown was a pro se petitioner at all relevant times and was making a relatively novel claim under a relatively new statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sossa v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.