Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 F. App'x 391 - Ogle v. Hocker

279 F. App'x 391 - Ogle v. Hocker’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. · Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. Milivojevich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And as I get on the plane, he begins to talk to me and I begin to realize that his doctrine is corrupt.... And when I get there [Belgium], he begins to manifest issues of homosexuality. He wants me to be his really good spiritual friend, quote unquote.... I see how easily the church can be tricked.... Now you listen to this — we must protect ourselves as the church of the living God. We must protect from heresies and false doctrines and false prophets who would lead the very elect away.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To the extent Ogle seeks damages based on the [Church of Godj’s decision to suspend him or the loss of his reputation within the [Church of God], Ogle’s claims might be barred by this rule. An inquiry into these damages might require consideration of whether the defamation caused the [Church of God]’s employment actions, thereby inviting an exploration of the church’s motives. A secular court cannot take this step.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “And I began to perceive that his doctrine was corrupt.... [H]e also wanted me to become his very good friend.... And I’m waiting on him to come back now from Belgium to face me, because I plan to face him in a counsel of ordained bishops and declare the man to be a heretic.... Because the enemy tried to take prophesy and the word of God and mesmerize me and take me out. This lawsuit by Ogle followed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.