Sullivan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952A · 18 U.S.C. § 1958 · 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Lopez · Jones v. United States · United States v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecution is barred if the accused was formerly prosecuted in a district court of the United States for a crime which is within the concurrent jurisdiction of this state if such former prosecution resulted in either a conviction or an acquittal and the subsequent prosecution is for the same conduct, unless each prosecution requires proof of a fact not required in the other prosecution or unless the crime was not consummated when the former trial began.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“is an existing Georgia penal provision comparable to the [f]ederal crime over which a state court has jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calloway v. State“require proof of a fact not required in the other prosecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Calloway v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.