Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 Ga. App. 162 - Herring v. State

279 Ga. App. 162 - Herring v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 225 Ga. App. 792 - Pickens v. State · State v. David · 268 Ga. App. 84 - McCray v. State · 185 Ga. App. 634 - Saylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In ruling on a motion to suppress, the trial court sits as the trier of fact, and the court’s findings are analogous to a jury verdict and will not be disturbed when the record contains any evidence to support those findings. When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, the evidence must be construed most favorably toward the court’s findings unless those findings are clearly erroneous. Further, in reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress, we consider all the evidence of record, including evidence introduced at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.