Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 Ga. App. 192 - Leonard v. State

279 Ga. App. 192 - Leonard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 245 Ga. App. 294 - Turner v. State · 235 Ga. App. 258 - Herndon v. State · 256 Ga. App. 642 - Jividen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it must be shown both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that but for this deficiency the outcome of the trial would have been different. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984). Failure to satisfy either prong of the Strickland standard is fatal to an ineffective assistance claim. In addition, a strong presumption exists that trial counsel performed within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. The trial court’s determination that [Miller] was afforded effective assistance of counsel will not be reversed on appeal unless it was clearly erroneous. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it must be shown both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that but for this deficiency the outcome of the trial would have been different. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984)____[A] strong presumption exists that trial counsel performed within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.