Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 Ga. App. 21 - Floyd v. State

279 Ga. App. 21 - Floyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 175 Ga. App. 741 - Cannon v. State · McAuliffe v. Rutledge · 213 Ga. App. 731 - Hasty v. State · 227 Ga. App. 64 - Haynes v. State · 243 Ga. App. 703 - Barnes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal defendant has the absolute right to file a timely direct appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered after a jury or bench trial. When the defendant loses that right as a result of the ineffective assistance of his counsel, he is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. It is the remedy for a frustrated right of appeal. 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.