Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 Ga. App. 352 - Liles v. Innerwork, Inc.

279 Ga. App. 352 - Liles v. Innerwork, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vaughn v. Pleasent · Moody v. Dykes · Gentile v. Miller, Stevenson & Steinichen, Inc. · Muldovan v. McEachern · 228 Ga. App. 516 - Lipton v. Warner, Mayoue & Bates, P.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “opposing summary judgment must be made on personal knowledge and must set forth such facts as would be admissible in the evidence. All hearsay evidence, unsupported conclusions, and the like, must be stricken or eliminated from consideration in a motion for summary judgment. A self-serving, conclusory affidavit not supported by fact or circumstances is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.