279 Ga. App. 484 - Sego v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Florida v. Bostick · Vansant v. State · 201 Ga. App. 495 - State v. McFarland · 191 Ga. App. 439 - Jackson v. State · 207 Ga. App. 60 - In the Interest of S. B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, the evidence at a hearing on a motion to suppress is uncontroverted and no question of credibility is presented, we review the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts de novo. Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) ( 443 SE2d 474 ) (1994). This Court’s responsibility in reviewing the trial court’s decision on the motion to suppress is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the trial court’s decision. State v. McFarland, 201 Ga. App. 495 ( 411 SE2d 314 ) (1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.