Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 GAAPP 809 - Tyler v. State

Tyler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2020

8 state decisions

70200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 237 Ga. App. 274 - Parrish v. State · 227 Ga. App. 496 - Ney v. State · 255 Ga. App. 784 - Hazelrigs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Defendant will submit a schedule of weekly activities to the probation officer and will be subject to curfews at the officer's discretion. 4. Defendant will remain appropriately clothed when in public and when the potential for public view exists. 9. Defendant shall not initiate contact with nor continue uninitiated contact with a child under the age of 18. 10. Defendant shall not be in the presence of a child under the age of 18 without the immediate presence of the supervisor who has been approved by the treatment provider and probation officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Etheridge v. State, 210 Ga.App. 96, 98 (1), 435 S.E.2d 292 (1993). See also Hazelrigs v. State, 255 Ga.App. 784, 786-787 (2), 567 S.E.2d 79 (2002) (trial counsel not ineffective in declining to call witness whose testimony might be favorable to defense, when witness' testimony nevertheless”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he witness proffered would have made no difference in the outcome of the case.... [T]rial counsel ... thoroughly attacked the video and interviewer on the same issues as the expert, most of which would have been readily discernible to and understood by the jurors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.