Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 ILL 375 - Alford v. Bennett

Alford v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 1991 · most notably In Re Estate of Reeve (1946), Swiney v. Womack (1931)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

80191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patch v. White · Kurtz v. Hibner · Thomas v. Thomas · Decker v. Decker · Fifer v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A will and codicil should be so construed as to give effect to every word and every part thereof without change or modification, and the several clauses should be made to harmonize so as to give effect to every provision, provided such construction is not inconsistent with the general intent and purpose of the testator, as gathered from the entire instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.