State v. Boley’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Woodward (2009), State v. Patton (2008)
2 district · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Lee v. United States · State v. Gould · In re Wiles · State v. McAdam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]lie State bore the risk that Boley would appeal his sentence. The prosecutor could have protected against this risk by including a provision in the plea agreement requiring the defendant to waive his right to appeal or indicating that if the defendant successfully challenged his sentence, such action would be considered a breach of the agreement.” Boley, 279 Kan. at 997 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Patton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.