Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 Mich. 629

273 N.W 294

Becht v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1937-05-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-05-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2011

20 state decisions

60193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wiest, J.

¶1 (dissenting in part). I do not join in the award to Mr. Lamb.

¶2 He took no part in the proceedings in the probate court but was employed by persons having a residuary interest in the distribution of the estate to appeal from the allowance of the final account of the executrix and, for his services, to have 25 per cent, of the total recovery, if he could not obtain compensation out of the estate. The express contract for compensation out of' such specified source or fund bars a quantum meruit allowance against the estate.

¶3 Will the allowance against the estate of less than the amount called for by the employment contract satisfy that contract or merely be applied thereon?

¶4 If it does not satisfy the contract agreement then may Mr. Lamb recover in part on quantum meruit against the estate and the remainder under the express agreement out of the fund recovered?

Fead, C. J., concurred with Wiest, J..
/279/mich/629 · .json · Public domain