Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 Mont. 185 - State v. Martin

State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State v. Blain Southern (1999), State v. Aakre (2002)

38 state decisions

1801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Just · State v. Matt · State v. Campbell · State v. Orsborn · State v. Tecca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears that a defendant ... is prejudiced by a joinder of charges... in an... information,... the court may order separate trials, ... or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness' credibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “First, a jury may consider the criminal defendant facing multiple charges a "bad man" and accumulate evidence until it finds him guilty of something. Second, a jury may use proof of guilt on one count to convict the defendant of a second count even though the proof would be inadmissible at a separate trial on the second count. Third, prejudice may occur when the defendant wishes to testify on his or her own behalf on one charge but not another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.