Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 N.C. 385

183 S.E.2d 105

State v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1971

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1971-09-07

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1974

22 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“"Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Edgecombe County with directions to proceed as follows: "1. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County will cause to be served on the defendant, Marie Hill, and on her attorneys of record, notice to appear during a session of said superior court at a designated time, not less than ten days from the date of the order, at which time, in open court, the defendant, Marie Hill, being present in person and being represented by her attorneys, the presiding judge, based on the verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree returned by the jury at the trial at the December 16, 1968 Criminal Session, will pronounce judgment that the defendant, Marie Hill, be imprisoned for life in the State's prison. "2. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the official having custody of the defendant, Marie Hill, to produce her in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgment imposing life imprisonment is pronounced. "Remanded for judgment."”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Childs

“2. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the official having custody of the defendant, Marie Hill, to produce her in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgment imposing life imprisonment is pronounced.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Childs

Relies on United States v. Jackson · Pope v. United States · Funicello v. New Jersey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-09-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HUSKINS, Justice.

¶1 At the trial of defendant, Dee D. Atkinson, at August, 1970 Criminal Session of the Superior Court of JOHNSTON County, North Carolina, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of rape and thereupon the court pronounced judgment which imposed a death sentence. Upon defendant’s appeal, this Court found “No error” in the trial and judgment, 278 N.C. 168, 179 S.E. 2d 410. On June 28, 1971, upon its consideration of defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States entered the following order: “The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment, insofar as it imposes the death sentence, is reversed, United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1968), Pope v. United States, 392 U.S. 651 (1968), and the case is remanded for further proceedings.” Dee D. Atkinson, Petitioner v. North Carolina, 403 U.S. 948, 29 L. Ed. 2d 861, 91 S.Ct. 2292 (1971).

¶2 Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Johnston County with directions to proceed as follows:

¶3 1. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Johnston County will cause to be served on the defendant, Dee D. Atkinson, and on his attorneys of record, notice to appear during a session of said superior court at a designated time, not less than ten days from the date of the order, at which time, in open court, the defendant, Dee D. Atkinson, being present in person and being represented by his attorneys, the presiding judge, based on the verdict of guilty of rape returned by the jury at *386 the trial at the August, 1970 Criminal Session, will pronounce judgment that the defendant, Dee D. Atkinson, be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison.

¶4 2. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Johnston County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the official having custody of the defendant, Dee D. Atkinson, to produce him in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgment imposing life imprisonment is pronounced.

¶5 Remanded for judgment.

¶6 Higgins and Lake, Justices, dissent for the reasons stated in their separate dissenting opinions filed this day in State v. Hill, ante 371, 183 S.E. 2d 97 (1971).

/279/nc/385 · .json · Public domain