Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 N.C. 511

183 S.E.2d 687

Hamel v. Young Spring & Wire Corp.

Reginald S. HAMEL, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of William Thomas McDowell, Jr. v. YOUNG SPRING & WIRE CORP. et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1971.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1971-10-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1987

3 state decisions

Relies on 12 N.C. App. 199 - Hamel v. YOUNG SPRING & WIRE CORPORATION

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Claude R. Dunbar, Hunter M. Jones, for plaintiff.

¶2John H. Small, R. C. Carmichael, Jr., for defendants Young Spring & Wire Corp., Paul Handeman, Inc., and Daybrook-Ottawa Corp.

¶3Carpenter, Golding, Crews & Meekins, Michael K. Gordon, for defendant Twin-States Truck Equipment Co.

¶4Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 182 S.E.2d 839.

¶5Denied.

/279/nc/511 · .json · Public domain