Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 N.J. Super. 607 - Haggerty v. Cedeno

279 N.J. Super. 607 - Haggerty v. Cedeno’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

4 district · 29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Veazey v. Doremus · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of Simmons · Mellk v. Sarahson · McSwain v. McSwain · Schwartz v. Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not designed to protect the injured party ... or to protect the driver.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]very owner of a vehicle used or operated in [New York] for death or injuries to person or property resulting from negligence in the use or operation of such vehicle[,]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a state's contacts are not related to the policies underlying its law, the state has no interest in having its law apply.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.