Haskell v. Haskell’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Masek v. Masek · Chipperfield v. Woessner · Wiesner v. Wiesner · Holforty v. Holforty · Howells v. Howells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The mother’s final contention is that the trial court committed reversible error by not giving her access to the report by the Department of Social Services, and an opportunity to cross-examine the author of the report. The investigation, which is the basis of the report, was conducted at the behest of the mother and upon agreement of the parties, without reservation as to inspection or cross-examination. Neither the mother nor her counsel asked the trial court for access to the report. In addition, her counsel on appeal stipulated the record minus the report. We will not address issues on appeal which have not been presented to the trial court. In re Estate of Assmus, 254 N.W.2d 159 (S.D.1977); Chipperfield v. Woessner, 84 S.D. 13 , 166 N.W.2d 727 (1969).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.