Bonds v. Landers’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
10 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2014
10 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) Two or more persons * * *; (2) an object to be accomplished; (3) a meeting of minds on the object or course of action; (4) one or more unlawful overt acts; and (5) damages as the proximate result thereof."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`A civil conspiracy is a combination of two or more persons by concerted action to accomplish an unlawful purpose, or to accomplish some purpose not in itself unlawful by unlawful means.' 15A CJS 596, Conspiracy § 1(1), citing Bliss v. Southern Pacific Co., 212 Or. 634 , 321 P.2d 324 (1958); Pitts v. King, 141 Or. 23 , 15 P.2d 379 , modified 141 Or. 23 , 15 P.2d 472 (1932).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he damage in a civil conspiracy flows from the overt acts and not from the conspiracy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.