Everett v. Premo’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We review the post-conviction court's denial of relief for legal error. In conducting that review, we are bound by the post-conviction court's findings of historical fact if those findings are supported by the evidence in the record. If the post-conviction court failed to make findings of fact on all the issues-and there is evidence from which such facts could be decided more than one way-we will presume that the facts were decided consistently with the post-conviction court's conclusions of law."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“That standard requires a determination that there is more than mere possibility, but less than probability that counsel's inadequacy affected the outcome of the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the record would have developed differently, and would have included evidence as to what written instructions were, in fact, provided to the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.