Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

279 S.C. 343

306 S.E.2d 621

Hunt v. Whitt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 25, 1983

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1983-08-25

Relies on Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. · Gunnells v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. · King v. Singer Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-08-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2017

22 state decisions

801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1 This is a Worker’s Compensation case here on appeal by the employer from an order of the circuit court reversing and remanding the case to the Hearing Commissioner for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony from the claimant. Because the interlocutory order of the circuit court does not involve the merits of the action, it is not reviewable by this Court for lack of finality. King v. The Singer Company, Power Tool Division, 276 S. C. 419, 279 S. E. (2d) 367 (1981). To the extent that the following cases and any others not cited can be construed to authorize appeals under the present circumstances, those cases are overruled. Couch v. Greenville *344 County, 249 S. C. 186, 153 S. E. (2d) 394 (1967); Amick v. City of Columbia, 247 S. C. 254, 146 S. E. (2d) 860 (1966); Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 241 S. C. 116, 127 S. E. (2d) 288 (1962).

¶2 The appeal is dismissed without prejudice. See Gunnells v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 261 S. C. 106, 198 S. E. (2d) 535 (1973).

/279/sc/343 · .json · Public domain