Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 S.C. 348 - Moseley v. Mosier

Moseley v. Mosier’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably Turner v. Rogers (2011), Turner v. Rogers (2011)

84 state decisions

3501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Curlee v. Howle · Smith v. Smith · Bryant v. Varat · Kelly v. Edwards · Brooks v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he parties' intent is rarely revealed from the agreement's words of art. Generally, those terms are used without intending or implying any particular legal consequences. Later, courts impose the consequences upon the unsuspecting parties. Today, we overrule those cases which hold that words of art make a major distinction in the operation of divorce law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[U]nless the agreement unambiguously denies the court jurisdiction, the terms will be modifiable by the court. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.