Karnuth v. United States ex rel. Albro’s Empirical Analysis
279 U.S. 231 · 1929
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 25 district · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 209 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2022 · most notably Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (1936), United States v. Ortiz (1975)
65 federal appellate · 25 district · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedUnited States v. Karnuth (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · Takao Ozawa v. United States · Lem Moon Sing v. United States · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 209 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * is inconsistent with a condition of hostility. * * * The reasons for the conclusion are obvious among them, that otherwise the door would be open for treasonable intercourse. And it is easy to see that such freedom of intercourse also may be incompatible with conditions following the termination of the war.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The contention is that respondents were temporary visitors for business; and the case is therefore narrowed to the simple inquiry whether the word ‘business,’ as used in the statute, includes ordinary work for hire. The word is one of flexibility; and, when used in a statute, its meaning depends upon the context or upon the purposes of the legislation. * * * ‘The true sense in which the word was here employed will be best ascertained by considering the policy, necessity, and causes which induced the enactment.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The history of this legislation points clearly to the conclusion that one of its great purposes was to protect American labor against the influx of foreign labor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.