Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback’s Empirical Analysis
279 U.S. 24 · 1929
Citation profile
92 federal appellate · 22 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 271 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014 · most notably Houtman v. Mann (1978), In the Matter of William Albert Talor, AKA William A. Taylor, Bankrupt Public Finance Corporation of Redlands v. William A. Taylor (1975)
92 federal appellate · 22 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedTaback v. Arai (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Tilghman v. Proctor · Gerdes v. Lustgarten · International Harvester Co. of America v. Carlson · In re Hughes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 271 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made and acquiesced in either with actual knowledge that it was incorrect, or with reckless indifference to the actual facts, without examining the available source of knowledge which lay at hand, and with no reasonable ground to believe that it was in fact correct.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Smith · In re David
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.