Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 279 U.S. 655 - Okanogan Methow San Poelis Nespelem Colville and Lake Indian Tribes or Bands of State of Washington v. United States

Okanogan Methow San Poelis Nespelem Colville and Lake Indian Tribes or Bands of State of Washington v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

279 U.S. 655 · 1929

Citation profile

302
cited by 302 later decisions
63
cited 63 times by the Supreme Court
29
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 15 district · 115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 302 later decisions (63 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Baker v. Carr (1962), Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983)

46 federal appellate · 15 district · 115 state decisions — followed in 29 states

66019291930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. United States · Martin Fairfax v. Hunter's · La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States · Tennessee v. Whitworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 302 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by their Adjournment prevent [the bill's] Return.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[l]ong settled and established practice is a consideration of great weight in a proper interpretation of constitutional provisions”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “enable Congress to proceed immediately with its reconsideration”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.