Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 A3D 506 - In Re Shirley

In Re Shirley’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Maness v. Meyers · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co. · Grayson v. AT & T CORP.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]onsent of the petitioner [of a CPO] does not bar a conviction of criminal contempt for [the] violation of a CPO.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To establish the elements of a CPO violation, the government must present evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant engaged in: (1) willful disobedience (2) of a protective court order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the respondent presumably would have an obligation to terminate the contact, if that is possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.