¶1In Huffman v. The State, at the present term, upon a re-examination of the cases of Windham v. The State, 26 Ala. 69, and Brown v. The State, 27 Ala. 47, we announced our determination to adhere to the exposition of section 3243 of the Code contained in them. Upon the authority of those cases, we affirm the judgment in the present case.
28 Ala. 47
Sweeney v. State
Decided January 15, 1856
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1856-01-15
<p>[INMCTSEENT FOR GAMING}.]</p> <p>1. Construction of statute {Code, § 3243) against gaming.- — Windham’s ease, 26 Ala. 69, and Brown’s case, 27 ib. 47, as to construction of statute against gaming, reaffirmed.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1874
3 state decisions
Relies on Brown v. State · Windham v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1856-01-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →