Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Ala. App. 243

182 So 92

Floyd v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1938

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1938-06-07

Relies on 28 Ala. App. 73 - Williams v. State · Browning v. State · Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1938-06-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1963

6 state decisions

201938194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SAMFORD, Judge.

¶1 The defendant was tried on an affidavit charging that he sold or possessed prohibited liquors, etc.

¶2 It is admitted by the defendant that, in Marion County and within twelve months before the beginning of the prosecution, he did possess prohibited liquor, but he claims, and it is also admitted, that he purchased such liquors from a State Liquor Store, and that it was properly stamped. This is no defense to the charge of ■ possessing whiskey or beer in a prohibition county. Williams v. State, ante, p. 73, 179 So. 915, certiorari denied 235 Ala. 520, 179 So. 920.

¶3 There is no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/28/alaapp/243 · .json · Public domain