Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 APPDC 243 - Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Garrison

Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1988

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

20190619101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Upton Assignee v. Tribilcock · Boering v. Chesapeake Beach Railway Co. · Paine v. Central Vt R · Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad v. Howard · Whiting v. Davidge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contracts would not be worth the paper on which they are written.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.