Biddle v. Smith & Campbell, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 25 Ark. App. 215 - College Club Dairy v. Carr · Houston Contracting Co. v. Young · Auslander v. Textile Workers Union of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Arkansas Court of Appeals has indicated that the determination as to whether or not an election of remedies has been made regarding workers’ compensation benefits depends upon whether the claimant actively initiated the proceedings or knowingly received benefits pursuant to the laws of another state. We find that the instant claimant made an election of remedies by knowingly receiving benefits pursuant to the workers’ compensation laws of the State of Ohio.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A claimant should be held to his affirmative acts and the resulting consequences of making an election of remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.