Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Bedell 167 - Hibbs v. . Brown

Hibbs v. . Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
13
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Bank of New York v. First Millennium, Inc. (2010), Enoch v. Brandon (1928)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions — followed in 13 states

150190719101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedHibbs v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A joint-stock company, whatever else may be said about it, is certainly for most, if not all, practical purposes a legal entity, capable in law of acting and assuming legal obligations quite independent of the shareholders. The idea that these companies occupy some undefined and undefinable ground midway between a partnership and a corporation has practically faded away, and cannot be applied to the question with which we are now concerned. * * * it iSj i think, very difficult to avoid the conclusion that these companies at this day and in this state possess substantially and practically all the attributes of corporations, and still more difficult to assign any sound reason for any distinction to be made between the negotiable character of the bonds of each, when made payable to bearer. These companies are for all practical purposes quasi corporations, and, it seems to me, are clearly such, so far as concerns the negotiable character of its commercial paper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.