Baldwin v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
110 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently September 1988 · most notably 46 Cal. 2d 690 - Primm v. Primm (1956), 189 Cal. App. 2d 658 - Clevenger v. Clevenger (1961)
110 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · DeYoung v. DeYoung · Carbone v. Superior Court · 28 Cal. 2d 243 - Crouch v. Crouch · Delanoy v. Delanoy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where there are no children, and either party has a separate estate sufficient for his or her proper support, no allowance shall be made from the separate estate of the other party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.