Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 CAL2D 602 - Strudthoff v. Yates

Strudthoff v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
3
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably Richter v. Walker (1951), 30 Cal. 2d 605 - Huth v. Katz (1947)

68 state decisions

320194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Decou v. Howell · Scholle v. Finnell · 23 Cal. 2d 454 - Estate of Lucas v. Brown · Baker v. Miller · 64 Cal. App. 2d 567 - United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Posted

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`No antecedent expression of the judge, whether casual or cast in the form of an opinion, can in any way restrict his absolute power to declare his final conclusion ... by filing the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(findings of fact and conclusions of law) provided for by ... the Code of Civil Procedure.' ( Scholle v. Finnell, 173 Cal. 372, 376 [ 159 P. 1179 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) Purchase any property of the estate ..., directly or indirectly,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.