¶1I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Stanton v. Panish, ante, page 107, at page 116 [167 Cal.Rptr. 584, 615 P.2d 1381]. I would deny issuance of the writ of mandate.
28 Cal. 3d 123
Chatterton v. Eu
Decided September 2, 1980
California Supreme Court · decided 1980-09-02
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1991
2 state decisions
Relies on 28 Cal. 3d 107 - Stanton v. Panish
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-09-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →